Real estate investors · Oshawa and Northumberland, Ontario

Eleven doors, $3.2M of equity, and a seven-figure tax bill with no cash behind it

A landlord in his late fifties with a strong portfolio and a deemed disposition that would have forced his family to sell into whatever market existed the week he died.
$3.2M
Portfolio value
Eleven doors
~$2.1M
Projected gain at death
Before CCA recapture
Zero
Doors the estate must sell
Liability funded by policy

The situation

  • Eleven residential doors across Oshawa and Northumberland, accumulated over eighteen years.
  • Approximately $3.2M of market value against a $1.1M adjusted cost base.
  • Mortgages roughly 45% of value; strong cash flow, almost no liquid assets outside the properties.
  • Two adult children, one interested in managing the portfolio and one not.

What was actually wrong

  • On the second death, the deemed disposition triggers capital gains on roughly $2.1M of appreciation. At a 50% inclusion rate and Ontario's top marginal rate, that is a materially seven-figure bill due within months.
  • The estate had no cash to pay it. The only way to settle would be selling doors — quickly, at whatever the market offered, with the CRA setting the deadline.
  • Recapture of previously claimed CCA added to the bill in a way the family had never quantified.
  • One child wanted the buildings and one wanted cash, with no mechanism to equalize.

What we did

  1. 1

    Quantify the number first

    We modelled the tax on death at current values and at conservative growth, including CCA recapture, so the family was solving a specific dollar amount instead of a vague worry.

  2. 2

    Create the liquidity, not the sale

    A joint last-to-die permanent policy sized to the projected liability. It pays exactly when the tax is due, tax-free, so the portfolio stays intact and the family sells on their timeline or not at all.

  3. 3

    Equalize between the children

    Insurance proceeds split so the child who wants the buildings inherits them and the child who does not receives equivalent value in cash — without either being forced into a partnership neither wanted.

  4. 4

    Fix the ownership structure going forward

    Coordinated with the accountant and lawyer on how new acquisitions are titled and how income is documented, so the debt service ratio supports continued buying rather than stalling the portfolio.

Where it landed

  • The projected estate tax bill is fully funded by a policy rather than by a forced sale.
  • Both children's inheritances are equalized without carving up buildings.
  • The family knows the number, reviews it annually as values move, and adjusts coverage instead of guessing.

These case studies are illustrative composites based on the types of engagements we run. Names, figures and identifying details have been changed or rounded to protect client privacy. They describe process and structure, not a guarantee of any particular result. Every situation depends on your own facts, and tax and insurance outcomes should be confirmed with your accountant and lawyer.

Is your structure any different?

A free 30-minute Fit Review. Bring your corporate year-end and your current coverage, and leave knowing your three biggest gaps — whether or not we ever work together.

Request an invitation